We use cookies on this website. By continuing to use this site without changing your cookie settings, you agree that you are happy to accept our privacy policy and for us to access our cookies on your device.
SummaryOn Cullen's own initiative: Data collection on architects in Berlin who were important in architectural life (40s and 50s), death and birth dates of architects for obituaries in newspapers and magazines; Question: What did you have to do to come to the Document Center as an American? Question: Did the Document Center also have a political function? Criticism of the management of the archive; Archive of a party with personal data; Finding means in the archive not satisfactory; Comparison with GDR archives; Relationship between Americans and Germans in the context of the archive; Question: Was the Document Center an instrument of American power?Question: Is the content of the archive still explosive today?On today's order of the archive of the Document Center; Reorganization of the Document Center, Cullen advises against, because researchers quote on these stocks; Access regulation will change by the takeover of the Federal Archives; Contact with the archive (party files) in Koblenz necessary; Microfilming of the stock; Good catalog necessary for the stock; Data protection regulation in Germany and comparison to the American equal right of use for all necessary; Book "The Federal Archives and its stocks"; Article: "Facilities of the National Socialist German Workers' Party... and affiliated associations
Shotlist
TagsArchive; Berlin; Politics; National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP); Party; Federal Republic of Germany (FRG); Berlin Document Center (BDC);
